Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Fikrah Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to exploring and advancing the field of Islamic education. The journal focuses on a broad range of topics related to Islamic pedagogy, curriculum development, teaching methodologies, and the challenges faced by Islamic educational institutions in the modern world. It aims to publish high-quality research that contributes to a deeper understanding of educational practices within Islamic contexts, both in formal and informal learning environments.

The scope of Fikrah Islami includes, but is not limited to, the following areas:

  • Curriculum and Instructional Design: Studies that examine the design, development, and implementation of Islamic education curricula at various educational levels, including K-12, higher education, and madrasah.
  • Pedagogical Innovations: Research on new and emerging teaching methodologies in Islamic education, focusing on both traditional and modern approaches.
  • Educational Management and Leadership: Contributions that analyze leadership practices, administrative structures, and organizational strategies in Islamic educational institutions.
  • Contemporary Issues in Islamic Education: Research that addresses the contemporary challenges faced by Islamic educators, such as integration of technology, inclusion, intercultural dialogue, and the impact of globalization.
  • Religious and Moral Education: Articles exploring the role of Islamic education in fostering religious, moral, and ethical development among students.

By publishing research on these topics, the journal aims to foster intellectual discussions and provide insights into the evolving nature of Islamic education worldwide. It seeks to contribute to the ongoing improvement of teaching practices, curriculum standards, and educational policies that influence Islamic educational institutions.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The peer review process is essential to maintaining the quality and academic integrity of Fikrah Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam. The journal follows a double-blind peer review process, ensuring that both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review procedure. This method promotes objectivity, transparency, and fairness in the evaluation of submitted manuscripts.

Steps of the Peer Review Process:

  1. Initial Submission:

    • Upon submission, manuscripts are first screened by the editorial team to assess whether they meet the journal’s scope and quality standards. This initial check ensures that the manuscript is relevant to the field of Islamic education and adheres to the journal's submission guidelines.

  2. Assignment of Reviewers:

    • If the manuscript passes the initial screening, it is sent to two or more independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant subject area of Islamic education. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and familiarity with the topic of the manuscript.

  3. Reviewing Process:

    • The reviewers evaluate the manuscript for originality, academic rigor, clarity, and contribution to the field of Islamic education. They provide detailed feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript, suggest improvements, and assess the manuscript's potential impact on the field.
    • Reviewers also check for the quality of the writing, adherence to academic standards, methodology, and whether the article is grounded in relevant literature.

  4. Reviewer Feedback:

    • Reviewers provide constructive comments, suggestions for revisions, and a recommendation regarding the manuscript’s acceptance, revision, or rejection. These comments aim to enhance the manuscript’s quality and improve its overall academic value.

  5. Decision:

    • After receiving feedback from the reviewers, the editorial team evaluates the comments and makes a final decision on the manuscript. Authors are notified of the decision and the reviewer comments.
    • Possible decisions include:
      • Accept with no revisions: The manuscript is deemed ready for publication as is.
      • Minor revisions: The manuscript is accepted, but the author must make minor changes before publication.
      • Major revisions: The manuscript has potential but requires significant changes and improvements. Authors are asked to revise and resubmit the manuscript.
      • Rejection: The manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal based on the reviewers' feedback.

  6. Revisions and Resubmission:

    • If the manuscript requires revisions, the authors are given a set period to make the necessary changes. Once the revised manuscript is submitted, it may be sent back to the reviewers for further evaluation. In some cases, a final decision may be made without additional review if the changes are minimal.

  7. Final Decision:

    • Once the revisions are finalized, the editorial team makes the final decision on the manuscript. Accepted articles are then prepared for publication.

  8. Publication:

    • After final approval, the manuscript is formatted according to the journal’s style guidelines and scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of Fikrah Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam.

Confidentiality and Ethics in Peer Review:

  • Confidentiality: All manuscripts are treated confidentially during the review process. The identity of the authors and reviewers is kept anonymous to ensure impartiality.
  • Ethical Review: Reviewers are expected to provide an unbiased evaluation based on the manuscript’s academic merit, avoiding personal or professional conflicts of interest. If a reviewer identifies a potential conflict of interest, they must disclose it to the editorial team immediately.

Benefits of Peer Review:

  • Quality Assurance: The peer review process ensures that only rigorous and high-quality research is published in Fikrah Islami, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in Islamic education.
  • Expert Feedback: Authors receive valuable feedback from experts in the field, allowing them to refine and strengthen their work before publication.
  • Academic Credibility: The peer review process enhances the credibility of the journal and the articles published within it, ensuring they meet the highest academic and ethical standards.

By following a thorough peer review process, Fikrah Islami ensures the publication of high-quality, scholarly work that contributes significantly to the field of Islamic education.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Author(s) Fee

Fikrah Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam does not charge any fees for manuscript submission, article processing, or publication. The journal adheres to an open-access model, meaning all published content is freely available to readers without any financial barriers. Authors are not required to pay any fees for their work to be published, and the journal is committed to providing a high-quality publication platform for scholars in the field of Islamic education without financial constraints.

By not charging authors or readers, Fikrah Islami ensures equitable access to its content, allowing researchers, educators, and students to benefit from high-quality, peer-reviewed articles at no cost.

 

Publication Ethics

Fikrah Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam is committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards in publishing. We adhere to internationally recognized ethical guidelines for academic journals and expect authors, reviewers, and editors to abide by these standards to ensure the integrity of the academic work published.

The journal’s publication ethics include the following:

  1. Plagiarism: The journal employs a strict policy against plagiarism. All manuscripts are checked for originality using plagiarism detection software. Any form of plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, will result in immediate rejection of the manuscript.
  2. Conflict of Interest: Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the objectivity of the research or the peer review process. This includes financial interests, personal relationships, or other factors that may bias the review or publication.
  3. Authorship: All individuals who have made a significant contribution to the research should be listed as authors. Corresponding authors are responsible for ensuring that all co-authors are appropriately credited and that there is no ghostwriting or honorary authorship.
  4. Confidentiality: The editorial team is committed to maintaining the confidentiality of all manuscripts during the review process. Manuscripts, as well as reviewer comments, are kept confidential and are not shared with any third parties.
  5. Corrections and Retractions: In the event of errors, misconduct, or disputes after publication, Fikrah Islami will follow the procedures outlined in the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines for issuing corrections, clarifications, retractions, or apologies as necessary.